On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: > "git rebase -e XYZ" is basically the same as > > EDITOR="sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@" \ > git rebase -i XYZ^ > > In English, it prepares the todo list for you to edit only commit XYZ > to save your time. The time saving is only significant when you edit a > lot of commits separately.
Is it correct to single out only "edit" for special treatment? If allowing "edit" on the command-line, then shouldn't command-line "reword" also be supported? I, for one, often need to reword a commit message (or two or three); far more frequently than I need to edit a commit. (This is a genuine question about perceived favoritism of "edit", as opposed to a request to further bloat the interface.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
