On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes: > >> I didn't mean to insult all Windows users in general. I was only >> referring to the fact that since the default Windows command line is not >> a POSIX shell, even an experienced Windows user might have trouble >> figuring out how to execute a shell loop. Putting this functionality in >> a git command or script, by contrast, would make it work universally, no >> fuss, no muss. > > ;-) > > Be it graft or replace, I do not think we want to invite people to > use these mechansims too lightly to locally rewrite their history > willy-nilly without fixing their mistakes at the object layer with > "commit --amend", "rebase", "bfg", etc. in the longer term. So in > that sense, adding a command to make it easy is not something I am > enthusiastic about. > > On the other hand, if the user does need to use graft or replace > (perhaps to prepare for casting the fixed history in stone with > filter-branch), it would be good to help them avoid making mistakes > while doing so and tool support may be a way to do so. > > So, ... I am of two minds. >
Maybe if we add a new command (or maybe a script) with a name long and cryptic-looking enough like "git create-replacement-object" it will scare casual users from touching it, while power users will be happy to benefit from it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
