John Keeping <j...@keeping.me.uk> writes:
>> I thought your suggestion was:
>>
>> 'rebase @{-1}' says 'Fast-fowarded HEAD to @{-1}'. It should say
>> 'Fast-forwarded HEAD to 4f407407 (rebase: allow "-" short-hand
>> for the previous branch, 2014-03-19)' instead.
>>
>> Or it could be:
>>
>> 'rebase @{-1}' says 'Fast-fowarded HEAD to @{-1}'. It should say
>> 'Fast-forwarded HEAD to master' instead.
>>
>> In either case, it does not look like such a change is about
>> teaching "-" as a synonym to "@{-1}".
>
> My suggestion was specifically:
>
> 'rebase -' says 'Fast-forwarded HEAD to -'. It should say
> 'Fast-forwarded HEAD to master' instead.
OK, it was closer to the latter.
But why is it OK to leave @{-1}, which is just as "hmm, I do not
remember what the previous branch was myself" when the user says
"@{-1}" in the output while it not OK to leave "-" in the output?
I do not think of any sane reason, and that is why I think this
improvement is not part of "teaching rebase that '-' can be used in
place of @{-1}" topic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
