On 03/21/2014 07:32 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Matthias Beyer <m...@beyermatthias.de> writes:
>
>> I know, I can fix this by fixing the clean task in my Makefile. But
>> maybe someone somewhere on this world doesn't know the git internals
>> as good as me (and, of course, my coworker). Is there _any chance
>> at all_ that this gets mentioned somewhere, so others don't fall into
>> this pit?
>
> Surely, we are here to please ;-) All of us want to make sure
> newbies do not shoot themselves in the foot.
>
> But the problem is what exactly should be mentioned. With a fresh
> wound with your LaTeX project still in your mind, you may be tempted
> to special case ".idx", but other newbies may inflict the same kind
> of hurt on themselves with different "find" patterns, e.g.
>
> $ find . -name '[0-9a-f]*[0-9a-f]' -type f -print | xargs rm -f
>
> when they know their project creates hexadecimal-numbered temoprary
> files, or whatever other pattern that match the files they do not
> care about, that also happens to match whatever is in $GIT_DIR. The
> only common caution that helps us to make sure "others do not fall
> into this pit" is "Files and directories in $GIT_DIR are used to
> record your work; do not muck with them unless you know what you are
> doing e.g. manually repairing a corrupt repository", but that is a
> bit lame, isn't it?
It might help some people to show the "find" incantation for skipping
files under .git, which I think would be something like
find . -name .git -prune -o \( [...] \) -print0 | xargs -0 rm -f
where "[...]" is whatever condition the user would otherwise use.
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhag...@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
