On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 05:57:41PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> Hmm, so the year you got is actually: 1623969404. That still seems off
> to me by a factor 20. I don't know if this is really worth digging into
> that much further, but I wonder what you would get for timestamps of:
> 
>   99999999999999999
>   9999999999999999
>   999999999999999
>   etc.
> 

AIX goes negative at about the same time Linux and Solaris segfault:

9999999 Sun Apr 26 10:46:39 1970 -0700
99999999 Sat Mar 3 02:46:39 1973 -0700
999999999 Sat Sep 8 18:46:39 2001 -0700
9999999999 Sat Nov 20 10:46:39 2286 -0700
99999999999 Wed Nov 16 02:46:39 5138 -0700
999999999999 Thu Sep 26 18:46:39 33658 -0700
9999999999999 Sun May 20 10:46:39 318857 -0700
99999999999999 Sat Nov 7 02:46:39 3170843 -0700
999999999999999 Sat Jul 4 18:46:39 31690708 -0700
9999999999999999 Sat Jan 25 10:46:39 316889355 -0700
99999999999999999 Wed Sep 6 02:46:39 -1126091476 -0700
999999999999999999 Thu Oct 24 18:46:39 1623969404 -0700

So, very bogus values.

Charles.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to