"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > Clarify that patch ID is now a sum of hashes, not a hash. > Document --stable and --unstable flags. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > --- > > changes from v2: > explicitly list the kinds of changes against which patch ID is stable > > Documentation/git-patch-id.txt | 23 ++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-patch-id.txt b/Documentation/git-patch-id.txt > index 312c3b1..30923e0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-patch-id.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-patch-id.txt > @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ git-patch-id - Compute unique ID for a patch > SYNOPSIS > -------- > [verse] > -'git patch-id' < <patch> > +'git patch-id' [--stable | --unstable] < <patch>
Thanks. It seems taht we are fairly inconsistent when writing alternatives on the SYNOPSIS line. A small minority seems to spell the above as "[--stable|--unstable]", which may want to be fixed (outside the context of this series, of course). > > DESCRIPTION > ----------- > -A "patch ID" is nothing but a SHA-1 of the diff associated with a patch, with > -whitespace and line numbers ignored. As such, it's "reasonably stable", but > at > -the same time also reasonably unique, i.e., two patches that have the same > "patch > -ID" are almost guaranteed to be the same thing. > +A "patch ID" is nothing but a sum of SHA-1 of the diff hunks associated with > a > +patch, with whitespace and line numbers ignored. As such, it's "reasonably > +stable", but at the same time also reasonably unique, i.e., two patches that > +have the same "patch ID" are almost guaranteed to be the same thing. Perhaps "nothing but" can go by now? > > IOW, you can use this thing to look for likely duplicate commits. > > @@ -27,6 +27,19 @@ This can be used to make a mapping from patch ID to commit > ID. > > OPTIONS > ------- > + > +--stable:: > + Use a symmetrical sum of hashes as the patch ID. > + With this option, reordering file diffs that make up a patch or > + splitting a diff up to multiple diffs that touch the same path > + does not affect the ID. > + This is the default. > + > +--unstable:: > + Use a non-symmetrical sum of hashes, such that reordering > + or splitting the patch does affect the ID. > + This was the default value for git 1.9 and older. I am not sure if swapping the default in this series is a wise decision. We typically introduce a new shiny toy to play with in a release and then later when the shiny toy proves to be useful, start to think about changing the default, but not before. > <patch>:: > The diff to create the ID of. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html