Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:

> I assumed that rolling back a non-consummated transaction in the case of
> early program death should be the responsibility of the library, not of
> the caller.  If I'm correct, the caller(s) won't have to be modified
> when the atexit facility is added, so I don't see a reason to add it
> before it is needed by a concrete backend.
>
> But you suggest that the caller should be involved.

I didn't say "should".  If the library can automatically rollback
without being called upon die() anywhere in the system, that is
better.  The suggestion was because I didn't think you were shooting
for such a completeness in the library part, and a possible way out
is for the caller to help.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to