> Did you measure that malloc on newer Windows-versions are actually faster?
No, I didn't. As I said, real reason for this patch is that Git version of
nedalloc fails to compile under MinGW-W64. If we still want to use nedalloc
under MinGW, this patch should be replaced with:
a) Updating nedalloc to newer release that succeeds to compile under MinGW-W64
(I'd prefer this option). As a bonus point, we can drop most (if not all) fixes
that Git currently has on top of nedallox.
OR
b) Patching specific problems that prevent compilation.
OR
c) Introducing separate MinGW/MinGW-W64 behavior to compat.mak.uname, least
preferred
option.N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����ا���ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf
