On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> brian m. carlson wrote:
>> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:20:07AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
>>> What happened to the
>>>
>>> struct object_id {
>>> unsigned char id[20];
>>> };
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> struct object {
>>> ...
>>> struct object_id id;
>>> };
>>>
>>> idea?
>>
>> There didn't seem to be a huge amount of support for it.
>
> I can make up for it in enthuasiasm. Please? It's something I've
> wanted for a long time but never found the time to do.
It's definitely better in the sense that the compiler will catch new
"char[20]" declarations for us. It's also a lot more work.
>> Also, there
>> were concerns that some architectures might impose alignment constraints
>> on it that made sizeof(struct object_id) != 20.
>
> Sounds awful. What architecture?
No architecture was named last time if I remember correctly. But we
could check "sizeof(struct object_id) == 20" in a test or something.
When people scream, we can pack the struct on that particular
platform?
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
