Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > It might make sense to just teach parse_commit_header to be a little > more thorough; it has to read past those lines anyway to find the author > and committer lines, so it would not be much more expensive to note > them. And then of course the code needs to be pulled out of the > pretty-printer and made generally accessible.
I notice that you said "might" above. > That's more or less what Christian's function is doing, though it > assumes things like that the parents come immediately after the tree, > and that they are all in a group. Those are all true for objects created > by git, but I think we can be a little flexible. The headers up to committer are cast in stone in their ordering, and I do not immediately see how loosening it would be beneficial. Unless you are trying to give users a new way to record exactly the same commit in twenty-four (or more) ways with their own object names, that is ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
