On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I am slightly puzzled why parse_revision_opt does not just call > > handle_revision_pseudo_opt. According to f6aca0dc4, it is because > > pseudo-options need to be acted on in-order, as they affect things like > > subsequent "--not" options, etc. But if we are using parse_options_step, > > shouldn't we be handling the options in order? > > > > I am sure I am just missing something obvious, so do not trouble > > yourself if you do not know the answer offhand. > > Sorry, I don't know ;-)
Hopefully I am not wasting your time by responding to an old thread, but I figured this out and wanted to post it for posterity. The answer is that it is not about handling _options_ in order, but that we need to handle pseudo-options in order with non-options, like: foo --not bar Stepping through the options with parseopt will just cover dashed options, but we handle non-option arguments later. So we have to handle the pseudo-arguments like "--not" at the same later time. So there's nothing interesting to clean up or fix here. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
