Pete Wyckoff <p...@padd.com> writes: > I'm not sure how to robustify this. At least doing the multiple > comparisons should make the tests work again. The goal of this > series of tests is to make sure that copy detection is working, > not to verify that the correct copy choice was made. That should > be in other (non-p4) tests.
"Choosing any of these as the copy source is fine" is a sensible way to fix the problem with this test. Would it be a better solution to avoid having multiple/ambiguous copy source candidates in the first place, by the way? > Do send patches based on Junio's master. I can ack, and they'll > show up in a future git release. > > Thanks! > > -- Pete -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
