On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:44 AM, David Turner <dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
> @@ -342,6 +342,15 @@ static char *prepare_index(int argc, const char **argv,
> const char *prefix,
>
> discard_cache();
> read_cache_from(index_lock.filename);
> + if (update_main_cache_tree(WRITE_TREE_SILENT) == 0) {
> + fd = open(index_lock.filename, O_WRONLY);
> + if (fd >= 0)
> + if (write_cache(fd, active_cache, active_nr)
> == 0) {
> + close_lock_file(&index_lock);
If write_cache() returns a negative value, index.lock is probably
corrupted. Should we die() instead of moving on and returning
index_lock.filename to the caller? The caller may move index.lock to
index later on and officially ruin "index".
> + }
> + }
> + else
> + fprintf(stderr, "FAiled to update main cache tree\n");
make the above line something like this for i18n support:
fprintf_ln(stderr, _("Failed to update main cache tree"));
>
> commit_style = COMMIT_NORMAL;
> return index_lock.filename;
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
