Current syntax description makes one wonder if there is any syntactic way
to distinguish between <branch> and <upstream> so that one can specify
<branch> but not <upstream>. The change makes it explicit that these
arguments are in fact positional.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorga...@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
index f14100a..4138554 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
 --------
 [verse]
 'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [options] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>]
-       [<upstream>] [<branch>]
+       [<upstream> [<branch>]]
 'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [options] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>]
        --root [<branch>]
 'git rebase' --continue | --skip | --abort | --edit-todo
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to