Am 05.10.2014 um 00:22 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
There's quite a lot of patches here, but most of them are preparatory
cleanups. The meat is in patches 13, 15, and 16.
[01/16]: foreach_alt_odb: propagate return value from callback
[02/16]: isxdigit: cast input to unsigned char
[03/16]: object_array: factor out slopbuf-freeing logic
[04/16]: object_array: add a "clear" function
[05/16]: clean up name allocation in prepare_revision_walk
[06/16]: reachable: clear pending array after walking it
[07/16]: t5304: use test_path_is_* instead of "test -f"
[08/16]: t5304: use helper to report failure of "test foo = bar"
[09/16]: prune: factor out loose-object directory traversal
[10/16]: count-objects: do not use xsize_t when counting object size
[11/16]: count-objects: use for_each_loose_file_in_objdir
[12/16]: sha1_file: add for_each iterators for loose and packed objects
[13/16]: prune: keep objects reachable from recent objects
[14/16]: pack-objects: refactor unpack-unreachable expiration check
[15/16]: pack-objects: match prune logic for discarding objects
[16/16]: write_sha1_file: freshen existing objects
Somebody please help me out here.
This applied on top of 'maint' (which does have c40fdd01) makes the
test #9 (prune: do not prune detached HEAD with no reflog) fail.
The test passes if the return value of freshen_file() is negated in
freshen_packed_object() (see my reply to patch 16).
If we merge 'dt/cache-tree-repair' (which in turn needs
'jc/reopen-lock-file') to 'maint' and then apply these on top, the
said test passes. But I do not see an apparent reason why X-<.
Didn't check this interaction, but it sounds strange.
René
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
