On 10/13/2014 11:07 PM, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:24:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> [...] >> Is your plan to reroll the prune-mtime stuff on top of these? The >> additional safety those patches would give us is valuable and they >> are pretty straight-forward---I was hoping to have them in the 2.2 >> release. > > Yes, I've delayed while thinking about the issues that Michael raised. > There are basically two paths I see: > > 1. These do not solve all problems/races, but are a solid base and > sensible path forward for further changes which we can worry about > later. > > 2. There is a better way to provide prune safety, and these patches > will get in the way of doing that. > > I wanted to make sure we are on path (1) and not path (2). :)
FWIW I think we are on path (1). Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html