David Aguilar <dav...@gmail.com> writes:

>> diff --git a/t/t7800-difftool.sh b/t/t7800-difftool.sh
>> index dc30a51..9cf5dc9 100755
>> --- a/t/t7800-difftool.sh
>> +++ b/t/t7800-difftool.sh
>> @@ -301,6 +301,14 @@ test_expect_success PERL 'say no to the second file' '
>>      ! grep br2 output
>>  '
>>  
>> +test_expect_success PERL 'ending prompt input with EOF' '
>> +    git difftool -x cat branch </dev/null >output &&
>> +    ! grep master output &&
>> +    ! grep branch output &&
>> +    ! grep m2 output &&
>> +    ! grep br2 output
>> +'
>
> Should we use "test_must_fail grep ..." instead of "! grep ..." here?

NO.  We do not expect system-supplied "grep" to dump core and
declare it as a test failure.  test_must_fail is for catching an
expected non-zero status exit from git commands, i.e. when we expect
our binary to correctly notice some condition and report that fact
with non-zero exit status, we do not want to mistake the binary
segfaulting as working correctly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to