On 11/16/2014 09:06 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 16.11.2014 um 08:21 schrieb Michael Haggerty:
>> @@ -559,9 +562,21 @@ int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv, const char
>> *prefix)
>> if (given_config_source.blob)
>> die("editing blobs is not supported");
>> git_config(git_default_config, NULL);
>> - launch_editor(given_config_source.file ?
>> - given_config_source.file : git_path("config"),
>> - NULL, NULL);
>> + config_file = xstrdup(given_config_source.file ?
>> + given_config_source.file :
>> git_path("config"));
>> + launch_editor(config_file, NULL, NULL);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In git 2.1, there was a bug in "git init" that left
>> + * the u+x bit set on the config file. To clean up any
>> + * repositories affected by that bug, and just because
>> + * it doesn't make sense for a config file to be
>> + * executable anyway, clear any executable bits from
>> + * the file (on a "best effort" basis):
>> + */
>> + if (!lstat(config_file, &st) && (st.st_mode & 0111))
>
> At this point we cannot be sure that config_file is a regular file, can
> we? It could also be a symbolic link. Wouldn't plain stat() be more
> correct then?
You make a good point. But I'm a little nervous about following symlinks
and changing permissions on some distant file. Also, the bug that we are
trying clean up after would not have created a symlink in this place, so
I think the cleanup is not so important if "config" is a symlink.
So I suggest that we stick with lstat(), but add S_ISREG(st.st_mode) to
the && chain above. Does that sound reasonable?
>> + chmod(config_file, st.st_mode & 07666);
>> + free(config_file);
>> }
>> else if (actions == ACTION_SET) {
>> int ret;
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhag...@alum.mit.edu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
