On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 12:55 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > David Turner <dtur...@twopensource.com> writes: > > > On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 17:48 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > >> > My patches are not the world's most beautiful, but they do work. I > >> > think some improvement might be possible by keeping info about tracked > >> > files in the index, and only storing the tree of ignored and untracked > >> > files separately. But I have not thought this through fully. In any > >> > case, making use of shared memory for the fs_cache (as some of your > >> > other patches do for the index) would definitely save time. > >> > >> By the way, what happened to your sse optimization in refs.c? I see > >> it's reverted but I didn't follow closely to know why. > > > > I don't know why either -- it works just fine. There was a bug, but I > > fixed it. Junio? > > I vaguely recall that the reason why we dropped it was because it > was too much code churn in an area that was being worked on in > parallel, but you may need to go back to the list archive for > details.
OK, in that case I'll try to remember to reroll it once the rest of the refs stuff lands. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
