On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:33:24AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Luis Henriques <hen...@camandro.org> writes: > > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:56:45AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> I actually do not think this is a good idea from debuggability. > > > > Do you think this could be merged with yet another switch? I can't > > think of a name for the switch, something like... "--hide-msgid"? > > In case it wasn't clear, by "this" I meant the removal of > "X-Mailer:", iow, "Adding --no-xmailer option is a bad idea from > debuggability's point of view". >
Oh, ok. I thought you were talking about the message-id. > Not adding message-id is not an option; MSAs are supposed to always > add one if they want to be RFC compliant, aren't they? Yes, of course -- having a message ID is a requirement. But I was hoping you could accept a solution similar to the one suggested by Kyle (adding him to Cc): he was suggesting hashing the message ID, which would be a good compromise, I believe. Cheers, -- Luís -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
