On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Johannes Schindelin
<johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
>>
>> > And *still*, this is *just* a global table with defaults. I would *still*
>> > need to copy-on-write when the first customization of the severity level
>> > takes place because I cannot allow the global defaults to be modified by
>> > one caller (that would defeat the whole purpose of having per-caller
>> > settings bundled in the fsck_options struct).
>
> There is no alloc. Right now, the initialization reads:
>
> struct fsck_options options = strict ?
> FSCK_OPTIONS_STRICT : FSCK_OPTIONS_DEFAULT;
Then it is just the matter of having
fsck_options_init(&options);
if (strict)
options.some_field = make_it_strict;
as the first few statements, no?
I am not sure why it is so difficult....
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
