"brian m. carlson" <sand...@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
> The only change from v2 is the addition of a fourth patch, which fixes
> t5500. It's necessary because the test wants packs for fetches to
> shallow clones to be minimal.
>
> I'm not especially thrilled with having to provide a --shallow command
> line argument, but the alternative is to buffer a potentially large
> amount of data in order to determine whether the remote side is shallow.
You spell "--thin-aggressive" as two words, "--thin" "--shallow", in
this series, essentially, no?
I think this is going in the right direction. The "shallow"
propagated on the wire from the fetcher is the right thing to use
to make this decision.
I wonder if the call to is_repository_shallow() is still necessary
(read: I would prefer to see it go away) where we decide between
"--objects-edge" and "--objects-edge-aggressive".
Here is the relevant part from 4/4:
@@ -2711,7 +2714,7 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc, const char **argv, const
char *prefix)
argv_array_push(&rp, "pack-objects");
if (thin) {
use_internal_rev_list = 1;
- argv_array_push(&rp, is_repository_shallow()
+ argv_array_push(&rp, is_repository_shallow() || shallow
? "--objects-edge-aggressive"
: "--objects-edge");
} else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
