Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 02:20:33AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> The fact that "git notes merge refs/heads/master" fails is a very
>> good prevention of end-user mistakes, and this removal of test
>> demonstrates that we are dropping a valuable safety.
>
> Is it really that valuable? If it were:
>
> git notes merge master
>
> I could see somebody running that accidentally.
> ...
> But we are talking about
> somebody who is already fully-qualifying a ref (and anything unqualified
> continues to get looked up under refs/notes).
That (specifically 'merge') is not my real worry. It's the other
way around, actually.
Because expand_notes_ref() makes sure that any given notes ref is
prefixed appropriately to start with refs/notes/,
git notes --ref=refs/heads/master add ...blah...
git notes --ref=refs/tag/v1.0 add ...blah...
would be a sensible way when somebody wants to keep a forest of
notes refs, one per real ref. Wouldn't they have already been
trained to spell "refs/heads/master" when they want to refer to
refs/notes/refs/heads/master because of this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
