"Dan Langille (dalangil)" <dalan...@cisco.com> writes: >> On Jan 20, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> "Dan Langille (dalangil)" <dalan...@cisco.com> writes: >> >>> I did not test this patch. Is that holding up a commit? >> >> I am hoping that you rebuilt the Git you use with this patch by the >> time you wrote the message I am responding to and have been using it >> for your daily Git needs ;-) >> >> I believe it is queued on the 'next' branch so that others like you >> who need the change can verify the improvements, and others unlike >> you who do not need the change can make sure the change does not >> cause unintended consequences. > > Is this the patch in question? > > https://github.com/git/git/commit/4dbe66464b4fd695c5989cc272fa0edd6475037c > > I ask because previous versions of the patch acted against http.h as > well and my failure with it. > > Could I expect that patch work against 2.3.0? > > It applies cleanly, compiles, but cores when I try a ‘git clone’. > Unmatched 2.3.0 succeeds.
It already is in 'master', so please holler if things break with that version. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
