On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
> We use this to test http pushing with a restricted
> commandline. Other scripts (like t5551, which does http
> fetching) will want to use it, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
> ---
> As we discussed a while ago, this is the exact same code that
> run_with_limited_stack uses in t7004. However, I think they are
> conceptually two different things, and I could imagine a platform where
> they have distinct implementations. So I did not refactor t7004 to make
> use of this.

Perhaps this commentary should be moved to the commit message so that
the next person who notices that run_with_limited_stack() is the same
will understand why it was left alone.

>  t/t5541-http-push-smart.sh | 6 ------
>  t/test-lib.sh              | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t5541-http-push-smart.sh b/t/t5541-http-push-smart.sh
> index d2c681e..1ecb588 100755
> --- a/t/t5541-http-push-smart.sh
> +++ b/t/t5541-http-push-smart.sh
> @@ -324,12 +324,6 @@ test_expect_success 'push into half-auth-complete 
> requires password' '
>         test_cmp expect actual
>  '
>
> -run_with_limited_cmdline () {
> -       (ulimit -s 128 && "$@")
> -}
> -
> -test_lazy_prereq CMDLINE_LIMIT 'run_with_limited_cmdline true'
> -
>  test_expect_success CMDLINE_LIMIT 'push 2000 tags over http' '
>         sha1=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
>         test_seq 2000 |
> diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
> index 7dd4b4d..9914d3e 100644
> --- a/t/test-lib.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
> @@ -1062,3 +1062,9 @@ test_lazy_prereq UNZIP '
>         "$GIT_UNZIP" -v
>         test $? -ne 127
>  '
> +
> +run_with_limited_cmdline () {
> +       (ulimit -s 128 && "$@")
> +}
> +
> +test_lazy_prereq CMDLINE_LIMIT 'run_with_limited_cmdline true'
> --
> 2.3.2.472.geadab3c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to