On Sunday, 15 March 2015 11:15 PM, Kevin D <m...@ikke.info> wrote: On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 05:58:19PM +0100, t.gumme...@gmail.com wrote: > On 03/15, Arup Rakshit wrote: > > On Sunday, March 15, 2015 01:30:04 PM you wrote: > > > > > > With --assume-unchanged you're promising git that you will not change > > > a file that is already in the repository. Git doesn't check those > > > files for changes anymore, which can improve performance. > > > > > > > I didn't understand your point. Could you please elaborate more on it ? > > --assume-unchanged only works on files that you added on the > repository, not on untracked files. Because you don't seem to want > these files in the repository, update-index --assume-unchanged will > not work for you. >
And to elaborate what on what t.gummerer meant earlier: git update-index --assume-unchanged is often abused to ignore already tracked files, thinking that they can change the file while git happily ignores it. --assume-unchanged was neaver built for this purpose, it's built for large code bases where parts of the code base never changes, and git checking this part would only slow it down. So that's why it's called a promise to git that the file never changes, because git doesn't check the status of the file everytime you run git status. But because the file is still tracked, any commit that changes the file causes git to still update that file, but git will then protest, because it found it the file actually changed in the mean time, and you broke that promise. But also already said, this only applies to tracked files, so not to files that aren't being tracked in the first place. Kevin Thanks both of you. As per your suggestions I resolved it. I found a good link on this topic too https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files/. Regards, Arup Rakshit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
