Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes:
> +static int unpack_sha1_header_to_strbuf(git_zstream *stream, unsigned char
> *map,
> + unsigned long mapsize,
> + struct strbuf *header)
> +{
> + unsigned char buffer[32], *cp;
> + unsigned long bufsiz = sizeof(buffer);
> + int status;
> +
> + status = unpack_sha1_header(stream, map, mapsize, buffer, bufsiz);
> +
> + if (status) {
> + strbuf_add(header, buffer, stream->next_out - buffer);
> + return status;
> + }
> +
> + do {
> + status = git_inflate(stream, 0);
> + strbuf_add(header, buffer, stream->next_out - buffer);
> + for (cp = buffer; cp < stream->next_out; cp++)
> + if (!*cp)
> + /* Found the NUL at the end of the header */
> + return 0;
> + stream->next_out = buffer;
> + stream->avail_out = bufsiz;
> + } while (status == Z_OK);
> + return -1;
A caller of unpack_sha1_header() gets the return from git_inflate();
I wonder if we should be returning "status" here for consistency,
perhaps?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
