Vitor Antunes <vitor....@gmail.com> writes:
> On April 20, 2015 6:43:49 AM GMT+01:00, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
> wrote:
>>Vitor Antunes <vitor....@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Add failing scenario where branch detection is enabled together with
>>> use client view. In this specific scenario git-p4 will break when the
>>> perforce client view removes part of the depot path.
>>
>>I somehow cannot parse "together with use client view", especially
>>the word "use". Is it "user client view" or something (I am not
>>familiar with p4 lingo), or perhaps "use of client view"?
>
> I meant "spec" instead of "view". As in - -use-client-spec.
>
> In perforce you need to configure your workspace using a client specification.
> One of the configured values is the client view, which maps files/folders in
> the
> server to locations in your local workspace. What I'm trying to fix with these
> patches is the ability of git-p4 to process the client view definition through
> the use of "p4 where" to determine the correct location of the local files,
> such
> that it is able to apply the necessary patches for submission to the perforce
> server.
>
> While thinking about client views I completely forgot that the git-p4 argument
> that enables thos feature uses "spec" and not "view".
So,... what's the conclusion? Should the log message be written
like this perhaps?
t9801: check git-p4's branch detection and client spec together
Add failing scenario where branch detection is enabled together
with use of client spec. In this specific scenario git-p4 will
break when the perforce client spec removes part of the depot
path.
The test case also includes an extra sub-file mapping to enforce
robustness check on git-p4 implementation.
Signed-off-by: Vitor Antunes <vitor....@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
