On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:35:44PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: > In ref_transaction_commit(), close the reference lockfiles immediately > to avoid keeping too many file descriptors open at a time. This is > pretty easy, because in the first loop (where we create the locks) we > already know what, if anything, has to be written into the lockfile. > So write it and close the lockfile immediately. In the second loop, > rename the lockfiles for reference updates into place, and in the > cleanup loop, unlock any references that are still locked (i.e., those > that were only being verified or deleted). > > I think this is a cleaner solution than Stefan's approach [1] of > closing and reopening fds based on an estimate of how many fds we can > afford to waste--we only need a single file descriptor at a time, and > we never have to close then reopen a lockfile. But it is a bit more > intrusive, so it might still be preferable to use Stefan's approach > for release 2.4.0, if indeed any fix for this problem is still being > considered for that release.
I like this approach much better. It seems like the best of all worlds (same performance, and we don't have to worry about whether and when to close lockfiles). Stefan's patch is just in pu at this point, right? I do not think there is any rushing/release concern. It is too late for either to be in v2.4.0, so the only decision is whether to aim for "master" or "maint". To me, they both seem to be in the same ballpark as far as risking a regression. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
