Phil Hord <phil.h...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks, will queue. >> >> Aside from the "much more invasive" possibility, the patch makes me >> wonder if it would have been a better design to have a static "todo" >> with a "current" pointer as two state files. Then reschedule would >> have been just the matter of decrementing the number in "current", >> instead of "grab the last line of one file and prepend to the other >> file, and then lose the last line". > > That's an interesting idea. Changing it now would impact anyone who > now depends on the current todo/done behavior, and I imagine there > are many.
Yeah, in case it wasn't clear, I was merely lamenting over water under the bridge, not seriously suggesting to break users to simplify our logic. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
