Hi Johannes, On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On 2015-05-21 11:48, Paul Tan wrote: >> Unfortunately, the usage of strbuf means that we lose the ability to >> know if an option was not provided at all (the value is NULL). This is >> important as some of these options are used to override the default >> configured behavior. > > Would this not be implied by the strbuf's len being 0?
You're right >.< I think I need more coffee as well ;-) It would mean adding STRBUF_INIT's to all of the option variables, but I don't think it is a problem. strbufs it is, then. >>> You might also want to verify that arg is `NULL` when `unset != 0`. >>> Something like this: >> >> Hmm, would there be a situation where arg is NULL when `unset != 0`? > > I forgot to say that my suggestion was purely meant as defensive coding. Yes, > `arg` *should* be `NULL` when `unset != 0`. Should ;-) > > By the way, just to make sure: My comments and suggestions are no demands; > you should feel very free to reject them when you feel that your code is > better without the suggested changes. I am just trying to be helpful. Thanks, your comments have been really helpful. I really do appreciate it :). Regards, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html