On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:30:28PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > Like Eric, I find the whole next_capability thing a little ugly. His
> > suggestion to pass in the parsing state is an improvement, but I wonder
> > why we need to parse at all. Can we keep the capabilities as:
> >
> > const char *capabilities[] = {
> > "multi_ack",
> > "thin-pack",
> > ... etc ...
> > };
> >
> > and then loop over the array?
>
> Yes, that would be much nicer. I also had this in mind but didn't know
> if there was a strong reason for the capabilities to be shoehorned
> into a single string as they are currently.
I don't think there is a good reason, beyond it being the simplest thing
for the current code to work. But as you can see from the existing
packet_write() in upload-pack, it's already going through some
contortions to handle optional capabilities (i.e., "capabilities" is by
no means the full list anymore).
Doing it item by item will mean we can't use a single packet_write() in
the v1 code, but it's OK to format into a buffer here (we already need
such a buffer for format_symref_info anyway).
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
