On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:15:22AM -0700, Jim Hill wrote:

> Check for an existing match before appending a path to the alternates
> file.  Beyond making git look smart to anyone checking the alternates
> file, this removes the last use of hold_lock_file_for_append.

Makes sense. We don't catch _all_ cases here (e.g., we do not bother to
see if "foo" is a symlink to "bar"), but we at least catch the obvious
ones.

>  void add_to_alternates_file(const char *reference)
>  {
> -     struct lock_file *lock = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct lock_file));
> [...]
> +     static struct lock_file lock = {0};

This seems like an unrelated change. I don't mind it in general, but it
should probably go in a separate patch.

> -     int fd = hold_lock_file_for_append(lock, 
> git_path("objects/info/alternates"), LOCK_DIE_ON_ERROR);
>       char *alt = mkpath("%s\n", reference);
> +     char *alts = git_path("objects/info/alternates");

A minor nit, but I found "alts" and "alt" to be a little bit similar
while reading. I wonder if "our_alts" or "alts_files" would be a little
more clear.

> +     struct strbuf altdata = STRBUF_INIT;
> +     struct string_list lines = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
> +
> +     if (strbuf_read_file(&altdata, alts, 0) < 0)
> +             if (errno != ENOENT)
> +                     die("alternates file unreadable");

Hmm, so we read the whole content in, then split it into a string list
of lines.  Might it be simpler to just read it line by line and compare
as we go? Like (totally untested);

  FILE *in, *out;
  ...

  out = fdopen_lock_file(&lock, "w");
  if (!out)
        die_errno("unable to fdopen alternates lockfile");

  in = fopen(alts, "r");
  if (in) {
        struct strbuf line = STRBUF_INIT;
        int found = 0;

        while (strbuf_getline(&line, in, '\n') != EOF) {
                if (!strcmp(reference, line.buf)) {
                        found = 1;
                        break;
                }
                fprintf_or_die(out, "%s\n", line.buf);
        }

        strbuf_release(&line);
        fclose(in);

        if (found) {
                rollback_lock_file(&lock);
                return;
        }

  }
  else if (errno != ENOENT)
          die_errno("unable to read alternates file");

  fprintf_or_die(out, "%s\n", reference);
  /* commit_lock_file, etc; it takes care of the fclose() */


Note that I also fdopen'd the output file, which makes the newline
handling a little easier (I think you can even drop the "alt" variable).
That's optional, and you could use strbuf_getwholeline to retain the
original newlines. But...

> +     strbuf_complete_line(&altdata);

This seems like a nice bugfix that you didn't mention. With the earlier
code, if your alternates file was missing a trailing newline, we would
produce a bogus output. So it makes sense to do (either this way, or the
way I showed above). I think it probably goes in the same commit (it's
part of the refactoring), but you may want to mention it in the commit
message.

> +cleanup:
> +     strbuf_reset(&altdata);

I think you want strbuf_release() here (though it goes away if you
follow my suggestion above).

> diff --git a/t/t5700-clone-reference.sh b/t/t5700-clone-reference.sh
> index 3e783fc..cd9fa34 100755
> --- a/t/t5700-clone-reference.sh
> +++ b/t/t5700-clone-reference.sh
> @@ -29,11 +29,11 @@ git prune'
>  cd "$base_dir"
>  
>  test_expect_success 'cloning with reference (-l -s)' \
> -'git clone -l -s --reference B A C'
> +'git clone -l -s --reference B --reference A --reference B A C'
>  
>  cd "$base_dir"
>  
> -test_expect_success 'existence of info/alternates' \
> +test_expect_success 'existence of info/alternates, no duplicates' \
>  'test_line_count = 2 C/.git/objects/info/alternates'

Generally we prefer a new separate test rather than trying to take over
an existing one (i.e., just add a new one with the clone and line-count
test together).

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to