On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Louis Stuber
<stub...@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Louis Stuber <stub...@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Delaite <antoine.dela...@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>
> ---
It looks like this patch applies on top of the bisect old/new series
posted by Antoine.
This should be stated somewhere.
> git-bisect.sh | 8 +++++++-
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
> index 109bd65..d3d19cb 100644
> --- a/git-bisect.sh
> +++ b/git-bisect.sh
> @@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ bisect_start() {
> then
> echo "$BISECT_BAD" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS" &&
> echo "$BISECT_GOOD" >>"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS"
> + if test "$BISECT_BAD" = "new"
> + then
> + echo "" > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_OLDNEWMODE"
> + fi
I am not sure it's worth it to have both BISECT_TERMS and BISECT_OLDNEWMODE.
Also please note that I suggested to Antoine that the BISECT_BAD and
BISECT_GOOD variables be renamed to something else, like I already did
in some C files.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
