Hi Michael,

On 2015-06-08 08:40, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> Previously, if a reflog entry's old or new SHA-1 was not resolvable to
> an object, that SHA-1 was silently ignored. Instead, report such cases
> as errors.

I like the idea, but I am a bit uncertain whether it would constitute "too 
backwards-incompatible" a change to make this an error. I think it could be 
argued both ways: it *is* an improvement, but it could also possibly disrupt 
scripts that work pretty nicely at the moment.

My fsck-api branch will help with this, of course, as users whose scripts break 
could be (temporarily) demote the error to a warning. I planned to work on it 
this week and would be happy to rebase it onto this here patch series.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to