On 06/08/2015 08:07 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes:
In 'grab_single_ref()' remove the extra count variable 'cnt' and
use the variable 'grab_cnt' of structure 'grab_ref_cbdata' directly
instead.
Change comment in 'struct ref_sort' to reflect changes in code.
I don't see how the comment change is related to the code change:
struct ref_sort {
struct ref_sort *next;
- int atom; /* index into used_atom array */
+ int atom; /* index into 'struct atom_value *' array */
unsigned reverse : 1;
};
@@ -881,7 +881,6 @@ static int grab_single_ref(const char *refname, const
unsigned char *sha1, int f
{
struct grab_ref_cbdata *cb = cb_data;
struct refinfo *ref;
- int cnt;
if (flag & REF_BAD_NAME) {
warning("ignoring ref with broken name %s", refname);
@@ -898,10 +897,8 @@ static int grab_single_ref(const char *refname, const
unsigned char *sha1, int f
*/
ref = new_refinfo(refname, sha1, flag);
- cnt = cb->grab_cnt;
- REALLOC_ARRAY(cb->grab_array, cnt + 1);
- cb->grab_array[cnt++] = ref;
- cb->grab_cnt = cnt;
+ REALLOC_ARRAY(cb->grab_array, cb->grab_cnt + 1);
+ cb->grab_array[cb->grab_cnt++] = ref;
return 0;
}
Did you squash the comment change into the wrong commit?
What I meant was, change the comment to reflect changes in code since
the comment was made, not relevant to the simplification of code.
I put these two together as they are trivial changes.
Either I could reword the commit message or split the commit.
--
Regards,
Karthik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
