Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes:
> + if(filter->merge_commit) {
space after if.
> @@ -938,7 +991,13 @@ void ref_array_clear(struct ref_array *array)
> */
> int filter_refs(int (for_each_ref_fn)(each_ref_fn, void *), struct
> ref_filter_cbdata *data)
> {
> - return for_each_ref_fn(ref_filter_handler, data);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = for_each_ref_fn(ref_filter_handler, data);
> + if (data->filter.merge_commit)
> + do_merge_filter(data);
Reading this, I first wondered why you did not do the merge_filter as
part of ref_filter_handler. It seems weird to fill-in an array and then
re-filter it. I think it would make sense to add a few comments, like
/* Simple per-ref filtering */
ret = for_each_ref_fn(ref_filter_handler, data);
/* Filters that need revision walking */
if (data->filter.merge_commit)
...
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
