But ENOENT is not a normal case at all. Should we not treat it the same way as other fopen() errors ? (either going on with default case or returning an error)
Would :
> if (!fp) {
> die("could not read file '%s': %s",
> filename, strerror(errno));
> } else {
be ok ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
