On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > I dunno. With respect to the original patch, I am OK if we just want to > revert it. This area of stash seems a bit under-designed IMHO, but if > people were happy enough with it before, I do not think the safety > benefit from ed178ef is that great (it is not saving you from destroying > working tree content, only the index state; the individual content blobs > are still available from git-fsck).
I feel the same way, in fact I'm +1 to revert it until we figure out a better way to deal with this properly. -- Ber Clausen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
