On 06/09/2015 06:42 PM, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> In set notation, >> >> "non-NULL" = >> "non-NULL and not NULL_SHA1" ∪ >> "non-NULL and equal to NULL_SHA1" >> >> The latter two are *not* treated the same, so I don't see how we can >> claim that "non-NULL" and "not NULL_SHA1" are treated the same. I must >> be misunderstanding you. >> >> Would it help if I changed the comment to >> >> Delete the specified reference. If old_sha1 is non-NULL and not >> NULL_SHA1, then verify that the current value of the reference is >> old_sha1 before deleting it. If old_sha1 is NULL or NULL_SHA1, >> delete the reference it it exists, regardless of its old value. >> >> ? > > This is very clear to me.
OK, I will make the change in v2 (with s/it it/if it/). Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
