On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes: > >>> I also have a feeling that compared to an implementation based on >>> paint_down_to_common(), including is_descendant_of(), this may be >>> less precise (e.g. it would be confused with clock skew that lasts >>> more than SLOP commits). If we are inventing a new helper (as >>> opposed to moving an existing one), we'd probably be better off >>> doing a thin wrapper around paint_down_to_common() than calling >>> revision-walk machinery. >> >> I'll have a look and get back to you. > > Not as part of this series, now I know it is a straight-forward port > of what we already have for "branch --merged". This series is not > yet about improving counting logic but first unifying the three. > > Thanks. >
Sure, added this to my personal TODO :) -- Regards, Karthik Nayak -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
