Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes:
>>> Alternatives would be strbuf_reset() or declaring and releasing the
>>> strbuf within the for-loop scope.
>>
>> Because _reset() just rewinds the .len pointer without deallocating,
>> you would need an extra _release() before it goes out of scope. If
>> it is expected that the strbuf will be reused for a number of times,
>> the length of the string each iteration uses is similar, and you
>> will iterate the loop many times, "_reset() each time and _release()
>> to clean-up" pattern would save many calls to realloc/free.
>
> Yep, that's why I suggested strbuf_reset() as an alternative (and
> likely would have chosen it myself).
OK, then let's do that by squashing this in.
builtin/reflog.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builtin/reflog.c b/builtin/reflog.c
index 3080865..e9ba600 100644
--- a/builtin/reflog.c
+++ b/builtin/reflog.c
@@ -733,10 +733,11 @@ static int cmd_reflog_create(int argc, const char **argv,
const char *prefix)
if (safe_create_reflog(argv[i], &err, 1)) {
error("could not create reflog %s: %s", argv[i],
err.buf);
+ strbuf_reset(&err);
status = 1;
- strbuf_release(&err);
}
}
+ strbuf_release(&err);
return status;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
