John Keeping <j...@keeping.me.uk> writes: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:10:49PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> On 2015-06-29 18:46, Lawrence Siebert wrote: >> >> > I appreciate your help. Okay, That all makes sense. >> > >> > I would note that something like: >> > git shortlog -s "$FILENAME: | cut -f 1 | paste -sd+ - | bc >> > >> > seems like it run much faster then: >> > >> > git log --oneline "$FILENAME" | wc -l >> >> How does it compare to `git rev-list -- "$FILENAME" | wc -l`? > > Or even `git rev-list --count HEAD -- "$FILENAME"`.
Ahh, OK. I didn't know we already had "rev-list --count". Then please disregard the suggestion to add the option to "log"; it still holds true that the option does not belong to "shortlog", but I do think "how many changes were made to this path" statistics driven by a script should use "rev-list" plumbing, and if it already has "--count" option, that is perfect ;-) Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
