On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Dave Borowitz <dborow...@google.com> writes: > >> Another way of looking at the problem with my assumptions is, I was >> assuming "pkt-line framing" was the same thing as "pkt-line header". >> You seem to be saying the definition of "pkt-line framing" is "header, >> and optional trailing newline". > > Yes. I thought that was what "Server SHOULD terminate with LF; > client MUST NOT require it" in the existing text meant.
Unfortunately, the existing text is littered with examples of "PKT-LINE(foo SP bar LF)". If we assume "PKT-LINE(...)" means "apply pkt-line framing to the [...]", then this strongly implies that "pkt-line framing" does _not_ include the trailing LF. (Or the logical but bizarre alternative reading that such an example might have _two_ trailing LFs :) > Ah, that reminds me of one thing I already said elsewhere. We need > to correct the above with s/Server/Sender/; s/Client/Receiver/; I > think. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
