On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 10:54:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes: >> > How about this instead: prefixing with "As originally implemented", >> > with a couple s/is/was/ thrown in... >> > >> > As originally implemented, creation of linked-worktrees was >> > accomplished via `git checkout --to <path> <branch>`, and cleanup >> > of leftover administrative files, after `<path>` is deleted, was >> > done with `git prune --worktrees`. However, a recent unrelated >> > change to `git prune` led to a discussion that concluded that >> > worktree-related maintenance functionality didn't belong in `git >> > prune`. >> > >> > Is that sufficient to clue in the reader that "checkout --to" is not >> > final form,... >> >> Yeah, I think that is a good way to address my concern. >> >> The current draft release notes to 2.5 mentions this feature as >> experimental and warns that its UI is bound to change. We will >> ship the upcoming release with "checkout --to" and the more places >> we advise the users that this UI is not final, the better. > > Here it is in patch form. (I wouldn't be surprised if the non-ASCII > characters in Duy's name in the context line get botched again...)
Ok, the following is merged: https://github.com/git/git.github.io/pull/87 Thanks both, Christian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
