Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Matthieu Moy >> <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: >>> Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> Add support to sort by version using the "v:refname" and >>>> "version:refname" option. This is achieved by using the >>>> 'version_cmp()' function as the comparing function for qsort. >>> >>> You should elaborate on why you need this. Given the context, I can >>> guess that you will need this to implement tag, but for example I first >>> wondered why you needed both version: and v:, but I guess it comes from >>> the fact that 'git tag --sort' can take version:refname or v:refname. >>> >>> I think this deserves a test and documentation in for-each-ref.txt. >> >> I'll add it to "for-each-ref.txt" documentation. >> About the tests, there are already tests for the same in git-tag.txt and >> that's the only reason I did not repeat the tests in for-each-ref. >> > > But since the porting is in a later commit, will add tests to for-each-ref.
Yes: to me "it's tested through 'git tag'" is a good argument to do only a superficial test, check that 'for-each-ref --sort v:refname' activate the sorting, but no detailed corner-case testing. But not a good argument to have no test at all on for-each-ref. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html