Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes: > I was just getting ready to re-roll this series[1] to address > Michael's comments[2] and noticed that the add-on patch 7/6 which I > sent later[3] seems to have been botched when Junio applied it to > 'pu'. It's currently at 36598db (Documentation/git-tools: drop > references to defunct tools, 2015-07-24) in > es/doc-clean-outdated-tools and it appears that the --scissors option > didn't cut off the leading cruft from the email conversation, thus the > commit has the wrong "subject" plus a bunch of email conversation gunk > in the commit message which doesn't belong. I understand that Junio > uses a relatively bleeding-edge version of Git for his day-to-day work > and was wondering if this is possible fallout from the git-am rewrite > in C?
It is more likely that I was just lazy, knowing that the patch [3] would not hit "next" and I'll have a more relaxed time to amend it after the release was done, and let "am -s" without "-c" take it. I just tried to re-apply the patch with "am -sc" on es/doc-clean-outdated-tools^ and the built-in one takes it just fine, so we should be OK. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
