Karthik Nayak <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote: > ... >> It is very very dissapointing to allow the "next atom only" >> implementation to squat on a good name "align:<type>,<width>", >> especially when I thought that the list agreed >> >> %(align:<type>,<width>) any string with or without %(atom) %(end) >> >> would be the way to go. > > From what I read, I thought we wanted the next atom or string to be > aligned, if we need to align everything within the %(end) atom.
Is that a serious comment? Did I read too much into your $gmane/275119, expecting that you understood everything you are saying "That's a good way to go" to? > I could do that :) Sure ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
