On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > So I am fine as long as "if-possible" turns a failure to make signed > push into a success _only_ when the reason of the failure is because > we did not see the capability supported by the receiving end. If > the reason why you cannot do a signed push is because you cannot > sign push certificate, "if-possible" should still fail.
I completely agree with your reasoning, and that's exactly how I implemented and documented --signed-if-possible. >From patch 6/7: +--signed-if-possible:: + Like --signed, but only if the server supports signed pushes. If + the server supports signed pushes but the `gpg` is not available, + the push will fail. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
