On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Michael Rappazzo <rappa...@gmail.com> writes:
>> + strbuf_strip_suffix(&head_ref, "\n");
>> +
>> + if (starts_with(head_ref.buf, ref_prefix)) {
>> + /* branch checked out */
>> + strbuf_remove(&head_ref, 0, strlen(ref_prefix));
>> + /* } else {
>> + * headless -- no-op
>> + */
>> + }
>> + printf("%s (%s)\n", path, head_ref.buf);
>
> Is this new command meant to be a Porcelain? This would not work as
> a plumbing that produces a machine-parseable stable output.
>
> I am not saying that it _should_; I do not know if we even need a
> 'list' command that is driven from an end-user script that gives
> anything more than "where the work trees are".
>
> My inclination is to suggest dropping the "which branch" code
> altogether and only give "path_only" behaviour.
The "which branch" was probably added in response to this [1] review,
which suggested that at some point, we might want to provide the user
with interesting information about each worktree, such as
branch/detached head, tag, locked status (plus lock reason and whether
currently accessible), prune-able status (plus reason). This could
optionally be controlled by --verbose or some other extended
formatting option.
The same review also suggested a --porcelain option for script writers.
[1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/275528
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
